14
I agree
allowed are refunded to the Treasurer and
credited to the respective votes.
It seems prima facie likely that, when
the practice was first started, the money was
drawn by the Department from the Treasury and
most of it, if not all of it, was paid out by
the Department the same day and the receipted
vouchers returned to the Treasury either the
same, or the next, day; but that gradually
payments became less prompt, until finally a
limit to the period of grace was laid down.
This practice has no doubt been regarded
locally as complying sufficiently with the first
sentence of C.R.288 because the payment by the
Treasury to the Department is actually made
within the month, but the fact remains that
the real payments may not be made by the depart-
ments until after the close of the month.
I think I am correct in saying that under
Home practice such an interpretation of the
date of payment rule would not be admitted, and
that the date of charge would be held to be the
actual date of payment by the department.
The practice of the Treasury handing over
the money to Departments to enable the Depart-
ments to make the actual payments to the persons
entitled to the money is necessary in Colonial
accounting, owing to the differences in the
accounting organisation in the Colonies from
that in the Home Departments, and it is a
practice to which, I think, little if any
objection can be taken. Whether Colonies
should continue to be allowed to treat payments
of this kind to Departments as final expenditure
is
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.